How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History of Philosophy and Science (Philosophical Studies Series)
亞里士多德的分類是本書最早和最有影響力的論文之一。亞里士多德的標題是希臘動詞的一種形式，用於在法律程序中發表反對或提交指控。到亞里士多德時代，這也意味著：表示或預言。
令人驚訝的是，亞里士多德所說的“謂語”不僅包括語言的一部分，還包括身體中的白色和人類的語言知識等非語言學的東西。 （類別I / ii）同樣令人驚訝的是，亞里士多德用“同名”和“同義詞”這些術語來描述所談論的事情，而不是用來談論他們的話。從Organon，形而上學和其他地方的證據來看，亞里士多德都意識到並能夠標記使用和提到的詞之間的區別;所以我們必須得出結論，在這個分類中，他並不是十分在意。
然而，就我們的目的而言，最好把“預言”這個術語看作是模糊的，並引入一些術語來消除歧義。代碼，Modrak和其他作者隨後使用術語“語言預測”和“形而上學的預言”。
O
One of the earliest and most influential treatises on the subject of this volume is Aristotle's Categories. Aristotle's title is a form of the Greek verb for speaking against or submitting an accusation in a legal proceeding. By the time of Aristotle, it also meant: to signify or to predicate. Surprisingly, the "predicates" Aristotle talks about include not only bits of language, but also such nonlinguistic items as the color white in a body and the knowledge of grammar in a man's soul. (Categories I/ii) Equally surprising are such details as Aristotle's use of the terms 'homonymy' and 'synonymy' in connection with things talked about rather than words used to talk about them. Judging from the evidence in the Organon, the Metaphysics, and elsewhere, Aristotle was both aware of and able to mark the distinction between using and men tioning words; and so we must conclude that in the Categories, he was not greatly concerned with it. For our purposes, however, it is best to treat the term 'predication' as if it were ambiguous and introduce some jargon to disambiguate it. Code, Modrak, and other authors of the essays which follow use the terms 'linguistic predication' and 'metaphysical predication' for this.
J. Bogen (Autor)
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 978-9027715838
原價 €:159.95 台幣價 NT$:6950 ||PIXNET_ARTICLE_TAGS||痞市集,圖書╱雜誌
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
法文 (2)
{{ article.title }}