Hermeneutic Communism: From Heidegger to Marx (Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture)
共產主義已經失去了它的大部分政治影響力和理論力量，不再是資本主義的有吸引力的替代品。共產主義在其原始的馬克思主義的表述中，承諾了一個發展的理想，但只有通過戰爭的邏輯，自柏林牆倒塌以來，其合法性已經下降。
分離共產主義與它的形而上學基礎，包括對永恆的歷史規律和無產階級幾乎神聖的概念的堅持信念，Gianni Vattimo和Santiago Zabala在資本主義的技術，帝國和工業化的形而上學的停滯時代重新詮釋了馬克思的理論是屈曲。雖然邁克爾·哈特和安東尼奧·內格里要求革命左派的回歸，但瓦提莫和扎巴拉擔心這只會導致更多的暴力和失敗的政治政策。相反，他們採取了馬丁·海德格爾，雅克·德里達和理查德·羅蒂的解釋學思想中的反基礎主義立場。
解釋學共產主義拋開了發展的理想和革命的廣泛要求，解釋學共產主義激發了對資本主義不平等的抵制，卻強調了真理的解釋性，從而干預了暴力和專制主義。平行Vattimo和Zabala著名的減弱宗教的工作，解釋學共產主義實現馬克思主義思想充分變革，政治上有效的潛力。
Having lost much of its political clout and theoretical power, communism no longer represents an appealing alternative to capitalism. In its original Marxist formulation, communism promised an ideal of development, but only through a logic of war, and while a number of reformist governments still promote this ideology, their legitimacy has steadily declined since the fall of the Berlin wall.
Separating communism from its metaphysical foundations, which include an abiding faith in the immutable laws of history and an almost holy conception of the proletariat, Gianni Vattimo and Santiago Zabala recast Marx's theories at a time when capitalism's metaphysical moorings―in technology, empire, and industrialization―are buckling. While Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri call for a return of the revolutionary left, Vattimo and Zabala fear this would lead only to more violence and failed political policy. Instead, they adopt an antifoundationalist stance drawn from the hermeneutic thought of Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, and Richard Rorty.
Publisher: Columbia University Press
ISBN: 978-0231158039
原價 US:22 NT$:760 ||PIXNET_ARTICLE_TAGS||痞市集,圖書╱雜誌
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
法文 (2)
{{ article.title }}